Chilean vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,538,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.360% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 360.4 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,605 compared to $54,644, a difference of 65.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $60,305, a difference of 65.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $65,113, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.3%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $32,500, a difference of 25.4%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $36,876, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 113.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 112.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 111.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 55.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 56.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 62.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 91.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 73.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 57.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 113.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 97.6%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.7% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.27%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 72.4%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 66.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%).