Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,348,182 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $54,644, a difference of 67.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $60,305, a difference of 66.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $65,113, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 16.3%), median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $32,500, a difference of 24.8%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $36,876, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 119.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 112.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 59.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 61.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 64.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 69.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 58.8%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 9th grade (93.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 67.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.5%).