Scandinavian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Lumbee

Good
Poor
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lumbee Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,143,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 96.0 Lumbee.
Scandinavian Integration in Lumbee Communities

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $60,305, a difference of 58.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $65,113, a difference of 58.1%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $54,644, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $32,500, a difference of 17.9%), median earnings ($46,433 compared to $36,876, a difference of 25.9%), and median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $41,715, a difference of 33.1%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Income
Income MetricScandinavianLumbee
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$29,845
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$68,679
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$54,644
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$36,876
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$41,715
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$32,500
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$34,584
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$60,305
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$65,113
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$40,550
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
21.3%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 135.5%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 123.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 121.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 49.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 53.3%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 56.6%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianLumbee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
20.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
31.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
33.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
31.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
30.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
33.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
28.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
22.9%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 85.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.3%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianLumbee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianLumbee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
56.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
75.6%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 61.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.2%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.7%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianLumbee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
39.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
48.2%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 47.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.0%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianLumbee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
10.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
55.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.8%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.3%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianLumbee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
91.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
85.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
83.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
54.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
48.9%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
34.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
24.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.1%

Scandinavian vs Lumbee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.3%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.9%).
Scandinavian vs Lumbee Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianLumbee
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
32.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
9.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%