Houma vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,021,021 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.389% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 389.1 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 81.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $34,584, a difference of 28.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $60,305, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,949 compared to $36,876, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($30,343 compared to $32,500, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $40,550, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.62%), single female poverty (33.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.8%), currently married (45.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 78.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.0%), associate's degree (28.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and college, 1 year or more (41.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.74%).