Zimbabwean vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,239,114 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.617% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 616.8 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,618 compared to $54,644, a difference of 65.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $65,113, a difference of 64.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $60,305, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.4%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $32,500, a difference of 25.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $36,876, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 141.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 125.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 122.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 52.0%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 54.8%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 69.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 87.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 76.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 68.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.4%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 111.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 108.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 91.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 76.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 72.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%).