Indian (Asian) vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,344,809 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $60,305, a difference of 98.2%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $54,644, a difference of 92.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $65,113, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 24.0%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $32,500, a difference of 43.0%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $36,876, a difference of 52.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 147.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 140.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 138.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 55.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 58.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 63.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 119.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 90.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 78.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.5%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 167.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 164.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 120.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 99.3%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.8%).