White/Caucasian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,264,732 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $60,305, a difference of 52.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $65,113, a difference of 50.6%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $54,644, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $32,500, a difference of 15.5%), median earnings ($45,197 compared to $36,876, a difference of 22.6%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $41,715, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 107.2%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 93.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 38.7%), single female poverty (22.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 49.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 64.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.0%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.72%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.5%).