Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,472,554 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $34,584, a difference of 45.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,319 compared to $60,305, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($70,208 compared to $54,644, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.7%), median male earnings ($46,655 compared to $41,715, a difference of 11.8%), and median earnings ($41,554 compared to $36,876, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 70.2%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.68%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 54.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 20.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (37.3% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 204.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 169.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 122.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 30.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 68.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 122.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 124.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (54.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.40%), college, 1 year or more (49.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 12th grade, no diploma (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%).