Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,663,396 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $34,584, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,748 compared to $60,305, a difference of 48.8%), and median household income ($80,373 compared to $54,644, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.3%), median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $41,715, a difference of 23.2%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $36,876, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 94.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 88.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 71.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 58.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 32.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.27%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 138.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 113.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 73.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 57.9%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.62%), 9th grade (93.6% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 57.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.4%).