Navajo vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,323,675 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $34,584, a difference of 22.5%), householder income over 65 years ($47,722 compared to $40,550, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $60,305, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($36,999 compared to $36,876, a difference of 0.33%), median male earnings ($42,098 compared to $41,715, a difference of 0.92%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $32,500, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and family poverty (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (25.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty among girls under 16 (30.5% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and female poverty (23.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (14.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.8%), average family size (3.65 compared to 3.32, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (40.1% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (39.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.93%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.6%).