Czechoslovakian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,758,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 63.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $60,305, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $65,113, a difference of 55.7%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $54,644, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $32,500, a difference of 19.2%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $36,876, a difference of 26.5%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 122.8%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 112.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 45.4%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 54.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 55.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 79.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 68.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.6%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 49.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.1%).