Swiss vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,010,417 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.899. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.445% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 444.8 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $60,305, a difference of 58.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $65,113, a difference of 58.3%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $54,644, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $32,500, a difference of 16.6%), median earnings ($46,315 compared to $36,876, a difference of 25.6%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $41,715, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 136.3%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 120.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 115.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 45.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 54.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 74.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 74.6%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 39.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and married-couple households (49.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.63%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 81.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 81.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 55.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.6%).