Sioux vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,607,928 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.085% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 1,084.7 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $34,584, a difference of 34.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $40,550, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $60,305, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,448 compared to $36,876, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $32,500, a difference of 7.9%), and median male earnings ($45,566 compared to $41,715, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (25.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (26.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.3%), single female poverty (31.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and family poverty (15.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (41.5% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.6%).