Australian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,310,120 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 238.4 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,480, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $55,965, a difference of 12.3%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $86,084, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,127, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,104, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), currently married (47.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.08, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.32%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.76%).