Arab vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,669,793 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $38,802, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $96,866, a difference of 0.49%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $106,144, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 52.2%), family poverty (9.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.25%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 62.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 55.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%).