Immigrants from Micronesia vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,161,861 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.454% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 454.2 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $96,866, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $44,480, a difference of 18.7%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $55,965, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $53,127, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $38,802, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.7%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.36%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 55.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.8%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%).