Kiowa vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,843,970 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 53.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $103,682, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($80,885 compared to $106,144, a difference of 31.2%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $86,084, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $38,802, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $53,127, a difference of 18.8%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $46,865, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 79.0%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 77.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 47.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (61.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.08, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 79.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.9%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.6%).