Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Norwegians

Fair
Excellent
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,573,762 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.660% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 660.0 Norwegians.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $96,866, a difference of 34.2%), wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $103,682, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $38,802, a difference of 13.1%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $61,104, a difference of 18.9%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $46,865, a difference of 19.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 73.8%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 72.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.3%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 45.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.5%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.08, a difference of 4.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 52.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoNorwegian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%