Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,716,384 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 28.7 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $38,802, a difference of 11.6%), per capita income ($49,316 compared to $44,480, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($51,624 compared to $46,865, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $61,104, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $53,127, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $103,682, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 111.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.6%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.72%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.29%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%).