Nonimmigrants vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,433,377 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($96,231 compared to $106,144, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $103,682, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $96,866, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $38,802, a difference of 4.8%), median earnings ($44,117 compared to $46,865, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $61,104, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.9%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 42.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.6%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.3%), associate's degree (42.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.1%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.4%).