Czech vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,562,799 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 23.2 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.3%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,164 compared to $86,084, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.3%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (49.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.8%), no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.28%).