Native Hawaiian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,094,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 13.4 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $61,104, a difference of 16.2%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $44,480, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $38,802, a difference of 0.89%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $106,144, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $103,682, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.19%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.08, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%).