Chilean vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,583,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.340% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 340.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.1%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $86,084, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $38,802, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,127, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $106,144, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 53.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.1%).