Fijian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,407,035 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.667. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.151% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 151.1 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $55,965, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $103,682, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,127, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,104, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $38,802, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 55.4%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 47.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 47.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 84.0%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.5%).