Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,318,461 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.135% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 135.4 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,480, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,802, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $46,865, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,127, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $103,682, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.08, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.90%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%).