New Zealander vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,489,356 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.197% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 197.5 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $44,480, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $86,084, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $61,104, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $53,127, a difference of 0.31%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $103,682, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.64%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%), currently married (47.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.90%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 58.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%).