Indian (Asian) vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,659,263 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 21.6 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $96,866, a difference of 23.4%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $86,084, a difference of 22.3%), and per capita income ($53,874 compared to $44,480, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,127, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $61,104, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 44.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.2%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.85%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 118.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.3%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%).