Arapaho vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,652,768 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 37.9 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,480, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,682, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,866, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,104, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,127, a difference of 20.7%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,802, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 83.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 76.7%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 163.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 157.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 157.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 60.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.08, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.0%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.0%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.3%).