Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,887,873 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.884. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.879% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 879.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.7%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $38,802, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $46,865, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,127, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $103,682, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $106,144, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.3%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.26%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.59%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 95.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.57%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.7%).