French vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,422,327 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 37.0 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $103,682, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $106,144, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $38,802, a difference of 0.90%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.08, a difference of 0.57%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.0%), associate's degree (45.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, 1 year or more (58.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.87%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).