Tsimshian vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Iroquois
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,979,670 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 19.1 Iroquois.
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $83,682, a difference of 16.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $42,430, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $39,104, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Excellent 25.1% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 78.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 78.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 38.2% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.5% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Tsimshian vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |