Immigrants from Grenada vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,286,654 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 49.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 55.1%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $36,408, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($89,249 compared to $90,543, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $87,255, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.7%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 46.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 57.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.9%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.64%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 242.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 136.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 42.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 90.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 113.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.7%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.7%).