Central American vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Central American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Central Americans

Iroquois

Poor
Fair
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Central American Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,458,059 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Iroquois.
Central American Integration in Iroquois Communities

Central American vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $47,380, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and median household income ($78,803 compared to $74,279, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $36,408, a difference of 0.23%), median earnings ($42,280 compared to $42,430, a difference of 0.36%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.60%).
Central American vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,560
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,087
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,803
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,280
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,093
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,492
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,626
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,144
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,321
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Central American vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.33%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.82%).
Central American vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.5%

Central American vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Central American vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Central American vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Central American vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
80.6%

Central American vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (43.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Central American vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
38.2%

Central American vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Central American vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
6.5%

Central American vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Central American vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.4%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Central American vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Central American vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricCentral AmericanIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%