Yup'ik vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,231,972 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 24.3 Iroquois.
Yup'ik Integration in Iroquois Communities

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $39,104, a difference of 28.1%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $49,374, a difference of 25.0%), and median earnings ($35,942 compared to $42,430, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($69,695 compared to $74,279, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,000 compared to $87,255, a difference of 7.7%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricYup'ikIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 143.2%), receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 141.2%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 118.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.3%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.1%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Tragic
13.5%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 213.3%), male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 189.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (13.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 187.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 83.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 85.4%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Tragic
80.6%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 106.8%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 47.7%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (39.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and family households (72.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 16.4%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 319.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 56.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 52.6%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Good
6.5%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (25.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 71.5%), bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 71.1%), and no schooling completed (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.29%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Yup'ik vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 211.1%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), male disability (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Yup'ik vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.7%