Immigrants from Singapore vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,420,203 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Singapore communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Singapore within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Singapore corresponds to an increase of 135.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,353 compared to $39,104, a difference of 49.2%), median family income ($134,818 compared to $90,543, a difference of 48.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,429 compared to $83,682, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income under 25 years ($56,835 compared to $47,380, a difference of 20.0%), and median female earnings ($47,986 compared to $36,408, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 70.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 63.9%), and receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 49.1%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.050%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 130.5%), professional degree (7.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 109.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Singapore and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 61.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.5%).