Jordanian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Iroquois

Exceptional
Fair
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,535,614 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Iroquois.
Jordanian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Jordanian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $87,255, a difference of 25.4%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $74,279, a difference of 23.6%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $90,543, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $47,380, a difference of 9.3%), and median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $36,408, a difference of 13.9%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricJordanianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Excellent
25.1%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.1%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.5%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
80.6%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.7%), family households (65.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.3%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Jordanian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.8%).
Jordanian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricJordanianIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%