Chippewa vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,830,906 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,104, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,374, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $42,430, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.40%).