French American Indian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,910,561 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.157% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 157.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $47,380, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $87,255, a difference of 2.9%), and per capita income ($40,244 compared to $39,104, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $36,408, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.53%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 4.4%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (45.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.2%), associate's degree (42.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.20%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.4%).