Paraguayan vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Paraguayans
Iroquois
7,568
SOCIAL INDEX
73.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
112th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Paraguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,074,644 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to an increase of 50.5 Iroquois.
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,737 compared to $74,279, a difference of 28.9%), per capita income ($50,385 compared to $39,104, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $83,682, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $47,380, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($43,173 compared to $36,408, a difference of 18.6%).
Income Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,385 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,016 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,737 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,068 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,975 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,173 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,614 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,615 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,447 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,443 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 46.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Poverty Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 80.6% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 28.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.3% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Good 6.5% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.6%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Education Level Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Paraguayan vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.1%).
Disability Metric | Paraguayan | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |