Native Hawaiian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,742,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,737, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $74,279, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $87,255, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $39,104, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.8%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.2%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.0%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%).