Scandinavian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Iroquois

Good
Fair
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,002,078 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 57.9 Iroquois.
Scandinavian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $74,279, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.2%), median earnings ($46,433 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $47,380, a difference of 11.1%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricScandinavianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 41.6%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.0%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 13.3%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.5%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.0%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
38.2%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 56.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 21.5%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
6.5%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Scandinavian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Scandinavian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianIroquois
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%