Aleut vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,542,768 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 173.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $53,737, a difference of 16.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $87,255, a difference of 14.7%), and median household income ($83,446 compared to $74,279, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $49,374, a difference of 3.6%), median earnings ($44,241 compared to $42,430, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.7%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.33%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.16%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.4%).