Nonimmigrants vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,994,270 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $87,255, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($79,429 compared to $74,279, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $36,408, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($44,117 compared to $42,430, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($40,669 compared to $39,104, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 7.5%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.86%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.92%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%).