Immigrants from Portugal vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,603,292 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $47,380, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $83,682, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $74,279, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $53,737, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $39,104, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (45.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.98%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.7%), college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.4%).