Crow vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,547,179 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 95.3 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $39,104, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $90,543, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $47,380, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,408, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $53,737, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 70.7%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.95%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 210.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.0%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.16, a difference of 21.1%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.3%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%).