Costa Rican vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Costa Ricans
Iroquois
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Costa Rican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,672,137 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 181.6 Iroquois.
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $87,255, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($87,262 compared to $74,279, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $90,543, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.85%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $36,408, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $42,430, a difference of 9.9%).
Income Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,090 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,989 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,262 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,645 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,279 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,622 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,106 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,565 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,779 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,638 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Excellent 25.1% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Poverty Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.1%), currently married (46.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.9% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.0%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Costa Rican vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |