Burmese vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Iroquois
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,723,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Iroquois.
Burmese vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $87,255, a difference of 39.2%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $74,279, a difference of 38.9%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $90,543, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.7%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $36,408, a difference of 23.4%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.1% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 66.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 57.0%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.0%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 38.2% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Burmese vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 55.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |