Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,147,918 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $39,104, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $87,255, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($93,051 compared to $74,279, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $53,737, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $47,380, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 45.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 38.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.5%).