Chilean vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Iroquois
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,157,075 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 42.9 Iroquois.
Chilean vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $87,255, a difference of 22.2%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $74,279, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $90,543, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.2%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Excellent 25.1% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 24.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chilean vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 40.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.5%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |