Immigrants from Ecuador vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,142,619 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 28.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $74,279, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.54%), median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $90,543, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 117.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 45.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%).